Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients: a Cross-Sectional Study From Tertiary Referral Hospital

Introduction Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, disabling skin disorder which is characterized by recurrent attacks of nodule, abscess, sinus tract formation and scarring. Oral/topical antibiotics, oral retinoids and TNF-alpha inhibitors are used for the treatment of HS. Objectives In the present study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) positivity and the presence of COVID-19 related symptoms in relation to the age, gender, body mass index, disease duration, treatment used for HS, treatment duration and smoking. Methods We conducted a comparative, cross-sectional study of 178 patients diagnosed with HS in a referral hospital. Age, gender, smoking status, body mass index, treatment modalities used for HS, the presence of COVID-19 related symptoms, history of close contact to a person with COVID-19 and COVID-19 real time-PCR results were determined by a telephone questionnaire. Results Sixty-three patients were female, whereas 115 patients were male. During COVID-19 pandemic, 94 out of 178 patients had COVID-19 related symptoms;COVID-19 real time-PCR test was performed in 109 (61.2%) patients. Thirty (27.5%) cases tested positive for COVID-19 whereas 79 (72.5%) tested negative. Conclusions Patients having COVID-19 related symptoms were shown to have statistically significantly higher mean age compared to the ones who did not have any symptoms (P = 0.031). No statistically significant relationship was found COVID-19 real time-PCR positivity and the type of treatment administered for HS when categorized as tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor, oral retinoid, topical antibiotic and oral antibiotic group (P > 0.05).

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on dermatology consultation requests from adult and paediatric emergency departments.

AIM: This study aimed to determine the characteristics of dermatology consultation requests from the adult and paediatric emergency departments (EDs) of a university hospital during 8 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and to compare them with the same 8 months of 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic medical records of dermatology consultation requests from adult and paediatric EDs between 15 March 2019 and 15 November 2019, and between 15 March 2020 and 15 November 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The study included 495 consecutive dermatology consultation requests. In total, 283 (57%) consultation requests occurred in 2019, vs 212 (43%) between in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of consultation requests per day was significantly lower in 2020 (0.9 ± 0.1 per day) than in 2019 (1.15 ± 0.1 per day; P = .002), and was significantly lower in March, April and May 2020, as compared with March, April, and May 2019 (P = .004, P = .001, and P = .001, respectively). The median time from onset of dermatological symptoms to ED presentation was significantly longer in 2020 than in 2019 (4 days in 2019 vs 7 days in 2020; P < .001). Dermatological emergencies in 2019 and 2020 constituted 6.7% of all emergency presentations, with no significant difference between the 2 years (7.1% of all ED presentations in 2019, vs 6.1% in 2020; P = .795). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 restrictions and fear of COVID-19 infection might have discouraged patients from presenting to EDs because of skin problems; however, the easing of COVID-19 restrictions might lead to an increase in ED presentations, including non-urgent dermatological disorders. In order to reduce unnecessary use of EDs and prevent ED overcrowding, the general public should be educated about what constitutes a dermatological emergency.

The effect of COVID-19 on patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria treated with omalizumab and antihistamines: A cross-sectional, comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is defined as recurrent attacks of urticaria present for more than six weeks. The monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, omalizumab, was approved for the treatment of CSU in patients who remain refractory to H1-antihistamines. Biologic agents are shown not to increase the risk of COVID-19 infection in different studies. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we aimed to determine the prevalance of COVID-19 infection in relation to the age, gender, presence of other comorbidities, and treatment given for CSU. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study of 233 patients diagnosed with CSU in a tertiary referral hospital. Demographical data, treatment given for CSU, the presence of COVID-19-related symptoms, history of close contact to a person with COVID-19 and COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results were determined via a telephone survey and checked from medical data records. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were female; whereas 73 were male. The mean age was 44.76. Out of 233 patients with chronic urticaria, 125 had symptoms related to COVID-19 infection. RT-PCR testing for COVID-19 was performed in 156 patients. Of 156 patients with COVID-19 RT-PCR test, RT-PCR result was positive in 15 cases. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant relationship was found between COVID-19 RT-PCR positivity and the type of treatment administered for chronic urticaria when the patients are divided into omalizumab ± oral antihistamines and only oral antihistamines treatment groups (p = 0.150). Omalizumab seems to be safe in the era of COVID-19.

Treatment of psoriasis with biologics in the early COVID-19 pandemic: A study examining patient attitudes toward the treatment and disease course.

BACKGROUND: Since March 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been ongoing all around the world with a wide range of clinical course including asymptomatic cases to severe and fatal respiratory tract disease. Patients on immunosuppressive treatments were predicted to be more susceptible to COVID-19. AIMS: It was aimed to assess treatment continuity, the course of psoriasis and the course and clinical features of COVID-19 in patients treated with biological agents for psoriasis at the early initial period of COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients treated with biological agents for psoriasis at our institute were contacted by phone between 1 and 10 July 2020 and fulfilled a questionnaire about their continuity to psoriasis treatments, clinical course of psoriasis, and any suspicion/diagnosis of COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients, 41 females and 65 males, were enrolled. Mean age of the patients was 46.1 ± 12.1 years (range: 19-77). Median duration of psoriasis was 18 years (min-max: 1 month-51 years). Twenty-four patients (22.6%) were using tumor necrosis alpha inhibitors (ETA:1, IFX:19, ADA:4), whereas 82 patients (77.4%) were using interleukin (IL) 12/23 or IL-17 inhibitors (UST:48, SECU:30, IXE:4). Seventy-six patients (71.7%) continued the treatment, whereas 30 patients (28.3%) interrupted the treatment voluntarily. Twenty out of 30 patients (66.6%) who interrupted the treatment had an exacerbation of psoriasis. None of the patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 in the study period. CONCLUSION: Patients with psoriasis who received biological therapy continued their treatment at a high rate during the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic. No COVID-19 diagnosis was made among patients whether they continued or discontinued treatment. Recurrence and exacerbation of psoriasis in a significant proportion of patients who interrupted treatment and absence of COVID-19 diagnosis in each group support the importance and safety of continuity of biological treatments for psoriasis in COVID-19 era.

Reimagining work safety behaviors in the light of COVID-19

[...]this pandemic has broadened the locus of safety compliance to include organizational outsiders. Physical proximity is imperative for promoting work safety behaviors Work safety behaviors are construed and measured as behaviors enacted in the physical boundaries of the workplace (e.g., Griffin & Neal, 2000). [...]previous research (e.g., Luria & Morag, 2012) has shown that physical proximity of supervisors to employees improves employee safety behaviors. Workers who are working from home are still vulnerable to work-related hazards. Besides COVID-19 being a large threat to employee safety, there are other physical and psychosocial safety risks of working from home.